<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Welcome to the EvoS Consortium!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://evostudies.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://evostudies.org</link>
	<description>Advancing the teaching of evolution in higher education.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 22:00:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pivoting around Smartphones &amp; Cigarettes: Evolved to Play in Extrastructural Interludes by Christopher Lynn</title>
		<link>http://evostudies.org/2012/05/pivoting-around-smartphones-cigarettes-evolved-to-play-in-extrastructural-interludes/comment-page-1/#comment-3294</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Lynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 22:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evostudies.org/?p=2036#comment-3294</guid>
		<description>Hi Peter,
That (expectation of/conditioning for arousal) makes perfect sense to me &amp; would seem to be the missing conceptual &amp; physiological link.  Obviously, I need to read your book when I have a chance to see what else you have already explained re my ponderings.  I am wondering if this theoretical (&amp; methodological?) approach will be useful in a study we&#039;re currently doing of tattoo behavior in college students...Playing with body projects &amp; identity...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Peter,<br />
That (expectation of/conditioning for arousal) makes perfect sense to me &amp; would seem to be the missing conceptual &amp; physiological link.  Obviously, I need to read your book when I have a chance to see what else you have already explained re my ponderings.  I am wondering if this theoretical (&amp; methodological?) approach will be useful in a study we&#8217;re currently doing of tattoo behavior in college students&#8230;Playing with body projects &amp; identity&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pivoting around Smartphones &amp; Cigarettes: Evolved to Play in Extrastructural Interludes by Peter G. Stromberg</title>
		<link>http://evostudies.org/2012/05/pivoting-around-smartphones-cigarettes-evolved-to-play-in-extrastructural-interludes/comment-page-1/#comment-3286</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter G. Stromberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 19:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evostudies.org/?p=2036#comment-3286</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris,

There&#039;s much of interest here, I&#039;ll just respond to one point.  Some of the research on ADHD suggests that we come to expect a certain level of emotional and cognitive arousal based on what we encounter in the environment, and that the increased rates of this disorder are rooted in the fast-paced, electronically saturated environment of contemporary society.  That is, the more arousal you have come to expect, the more you need to fend off discomfort and dysfunction.

If this is true, then it may be useful to think of boredom as a form of withdrawal from expected or desired levels of arousal.  The analogy here is, of course, to withdrawal from a psychoactive chemical, except that perhaps it&#039;s not an analogy.  

I think risk, as you say, isn&#039;t intrinsic to play, it&#039;s just that risk is an enormously powerful source of arousal.  But even the most innocent, non-risky,  social interaction can be arousing. (I&#039;ve got a text!).  So, in sum, I suspect that one driver of all this (and only one) is simply the homeostatic processes of nervous arousal in our society.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris,</p>
<p>There&#8217;s much of interest here, I&#8217;ll just respond to one point.  Some of the research on ADHD suggests that we come to expect a certain level of emotional and cognitive arousal based on what we encounter in the environment, and that the increased rates of this disorder are rooted in the fast-paced, electronically saturated environment of contemporary society.  That is, the more arousal you have come to expect, the more you need to fend off discomfort and dysfunction.</p>
<p>If this is true, then it may be useful to think of boredom as a form of withdrawal from expected or desired levels of arousal.  The analogy here is, of course, to withdrawal from a psychoactive chemical, except that perhaps it&#8217;s not an analogy.  </p>
<p>I think risk, as you say, isn&#8217;t intrinsic to play, it&#8217;s just that risk is an enormously powerful source of arousal.  But even the most innocent, non-risky,  social interaction can be arousing. (I&#8217;ve got a text!).  So, in sum, I suspect that one driver of all this (and only one) is simply the homeostatic processes of nervous arousal in our society.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Biological Anthropology Blogs by Christopher Lynn</title>
		<link>http://evostudies.org/2012/05/biological-anthropology-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-3141</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Lynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 23:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evostudies.org/?p=1960#comment-3141</guid>
		<description>LOL. Thanks for letting me know, Michelle.  I&#039;ll fix it ASAP!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL. Thanks for letting me know, Michelle.  I&#8217;ll fix it ASAP!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Biological Anthropology Blogs by michellespidermonkey</title>
		<link>http://evostudies.org/2012/05/biological-anthropology-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-3140</link>
		<dc:creator>michellespidermonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 22:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evostudies.org/?p=1960#comment-3140</guid>
		<description>I actually do have a last name and it&#039;s not really spider monkey!  My real name is Michelle Rodrigues... perhaps it&#039;s time to update the &quot;about me&quot; section of my blog :)

Anyway, blogging as part of a graduate seminar sounds like a great idea!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually do have a last name and it&#8217;s not really spider monkey!  My real name is Michelle Rodrigues&#8230; perhaps it&#8217;s time to update the &#8220;about me&#8221; section of my blog :)</p>
<p>Anyway, blogging as part of a graduate seminar sounds like a great idea!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The World Loses an Exemplary Evolutionist: Remembering Maureen O&#8217;Sullivan by Kaja</title>
		<link>http://evostudies.org/2010/07/the-world-loses-an-exemplary-evolutionist-remembering-maureen-osullivan/comment-page-1/#comment-3137</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 19:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evostudies.org/test/?p=403#comment-3137</guid>
		<description>This is an amazing tribute and totally spot-on. Today, two years after her death, I find myself googling her in hopes of finding a digital trace I&#039;ve yet to unearth. How wonderful it is to find and read these words. She was a powerful, funny, intelligent, insightful and wholly &quot;real&quot; presence, as Glenn so perfectly captures. Thank you, Glenn, your tribute to this wonderful woman. May her work continue to guide and inspire and may she live on in our hearts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an amazing tribute and totally spot-on. Today, two years after her death, I find myself googling her in hopes of finding a digital trace I&#8217;ve yet to unearth. How wonderful it is to find and read these words. She was a powerful, funny, intelligent, insightful and wholly &#8220;real&#8221; presence, as Glenn so perfectly captures. Thank you, Glenn, your tribute to this wonderful woman. May her work continue to guide and inspire and may she live on in our hearts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Evolutionary Clinical Stuff at HBES 2012 by Christopher Lynn</title>
		<link>http://evostudies.org/2012/05/evolutionary-clinical-stuff-at-hbes-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-3128</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Lynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 05:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evostudies.org/?p=1983#comment-3128</guid>
		<description>See you there!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See you there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Poor DSM: Atheoretical, Overpathologizing, and Friendless? by Daniel Glass</title>
		<link>http://evostudies.org/2012/05/poor-dsm/comment-page-1/#comment-3088</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Glass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 19:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evostudies.org/?p=1923#comment-3088</guid>
		<description>Leif, your 2003 article on evolutionary clinical psych is one of the best overviews I&#039;ve seen on the state of the field. I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve had the chance to read your chapter in Buss &amp; Hawley, but I have it in my list of things to read. If you believe that mapping the evolved mechanisms of the functional human mind, I urge you to check out my other (brand new) project, www.psychtable.org and let me know what you think. I will blog about it soon in a future post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leif, your 2003 article on evolutionary clinical psych is one of the best overviews I&#8217;ve seen on the state of the field. I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve had the chance to read your chapter in Buss &#038; Hawley, but I have it in my list of things to read. If you believe that mapping the evolved mechanisms of the functional human mind, I urge you to check out my other (brand new) project, <a href="http://www.psychtable.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.psychtable.org</a> and let me know what you think. I will blog about it soon in a future post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Poor DSM: Atheoretical, Overpathologizing, and Friendless? by Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair</title>
		<link>http://evostudies.org/2012/05/poor-dsm/comment-page-1/#comment-3085</link>
		<dc:creator>Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 19:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evostudies.org/?p=1923#comment-3085</guid>
		<description>It would of great importance to show how a theoretical approach could provide a better approach; maybe actually describing relevant phenotypes and carving nature at its joints... and my claim (e.g. in my chapter in Buss &amp; Hawley&#039;s The Evolution of Personality and Individual Differences) is that this would call both for more work on the normal evolved mental mechanisms, mapping the evolved functional mind, as well as work considering how these mechanisms malfunction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would of great importance to show how a theoretical approach could provide a better approach; maybe actually describing relevant phenotypes and carving nature at its joints&#8230; and my claim (e.g. in my chapter in Buss &amp; Hawley&#8217;s The Evolution of Personality and Individual Differences) is that this would call both for more work on the normal evolved mental mechanisms, mapping the evolved functional mind, as well as work considering how these mechanisms malfunction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Improving an Introduction to Evolutionary Studies Course by John</title>
		<link>http://evostudies.org/2012/05/improving-an-introduction-to-evolutionary-studies-course/comment-page-1/#comment-3070</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 15:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evostudies.org/?p=1958#comment-3070</guid>
		<description>The Botton talk is just 5 min long and really got me thinking about how the secular world does a bad job from a pedagogical standpoint, it&#039;s one of my favorite TED talks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Botton talk is just 5 min long and really got me thinking about how the secular world does a bad job from a pedagogical standpoint, it&#8217;s one of my favorite TED talks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Improving an Introduction to Evolutionary Studies Course by Christopher Lynn</title>
		<link>http://evostudies.org/2012/05/improving-an-introduction-to-evolutionary-studies-course/comment-page-1/#comment-3066</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Lynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 03:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evostudies.org/?p=1958#comment-3066</guid>
		<description>Well stated, John, &amp; thanks again for your insightful comments.  I was once far less moderate myself, &amp; was decidely angry about the &quot;religious ignorance&quot; I felt I&#039;d grown up around in Indiana before moving to NY.  I credit anthropology with opening my eyes thru enabling me to have an open mind about non-Judeo-Christian traditions, which I then realized I should be turning toward those around me as well.  In particular, I think it was reading &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.beha.tcu.edu.tw/class2/05b%20Towards%20a%20native%20anthropology.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Delmos Jones&#039; &quot;Towards a Native Anthropology&quot;&lt;/a&gt; that alerted me to the importance of studying one&#039;s own community of development, perhaps after studying a more exotic one, to see it in a more objective light, which is what led me to do a 180 in how I view fundamentalist Christianity.  So, yeah, I certainly value that angry young person stage &amp; think it may be an important transitional phase for some people.  It is nice to see young people feel strongly about something, because far too often we&#039;re greeted by bovine stares in the classrooms.

And you&#039;re right about bringing in a speaker who can rectify religiosity &amp; evolution.  That will be interesting.  And I actually have one like that already lined up.  I contacted a faculty member in Aerospace Engineering who does biomimetics, which is studying design features in animals (she looks at shark skin &amp; butterfly wings) &amp; reverse-engineering them to solve human engineering problems.  She welcomed my invitation to come speak to the class but felt obliged to warn me that she is a Christian Scientist &amp; to give me a run down on what that means.  And last year we had an ALLELE speaker, Mary Schweitzer, who grew up as a fundamentalist Christian but loved dinosaurs.  In specializing in dinosaur evolution, she was forced to abandon the literalist position of fundamentalism or her passion for dinosaurs...she chose the dinosaurs.  So, yeah, I agree with you, interesting stuff &amp; important too.  This fall I&#039;m trying to lure Joseph Bulbulia, who studies the evolution of religion, to speak as part of the series.

And you&#039;ve given me more homework.  I still haven&#039;t caught up with the last assignment, but I haven&#039;t forgotten.  Keep it coming.  I&#039;m happy to have the opportunity to share ideas &amp; thoughts like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well stated, John, &amp; thanks again for your insightful comments.  I was once far less moderate myself, &amp; was decidely angry about the &#8220;religious ignorance&#8221; I felt I&#8217;d grown up around in Indiana before moving to NY.  I credit anthropology with opening my eyes thru enabling me to have an open mind about non-Judeo-Christian traditions, which I then realized I should be turning toward those around me as well.  In particular, I think it was reading <a href="http://www.beha.tcu.edu.tw/class2/05b%20Towards%20a%20native%20anthropology.pdf" rel="nofollow">Delmos Jones&#8217; &#8220;Towards a Native Anthropology&#8221;</a> that alerted me to the importance of studying one&#8217;s own community of development, perhaps after studying a more exotic one, to see it in a more objective light, which is what led me to do a 180 in how I view fundamentalist Christianity.  So, yeah, I certainly value that angry young person stage &amp; think it may be an important transitional phase for some people.  It is nice to see young people feel strongly about something, because far too often we&#8217;re greeted by bovine stares in the classrooms.</p>
<p>And you&#8217;re right about bringing in a speaker who can rectify religiosity &amp; evolution.  That will be interesting.  And I actually have one like that already lined up.  I contacted a faculty member in Aerospace Engineering who does biomimetics, which is studying design features in animals (she looks at shark skin &amp; butterfly wings) &amp; reverse-engineering them to solve human engineering problems.  She welcomed my invitation to come speak to the class but felt obliged to warn me that she is a Christian Scientist &amp; to give me a run down on what that means.  And last year we had an ALLELE speaker, Mary Schweitzer, who grew up as a fundamentalist Christian but loved dinosaurs.  In specializing in dinosaur evolution, she was forced to abandon the literalist position of fundamentalism or her passion for dinosaurs&#8230;she chose the dinosaurs.  So, yeah, I agree with you, interesting stuff &amp; important too.  This fall I&#8217;m trying to lure Joseph Bulbulia, who studies the evolution of religion, to speak as part of the series.</p>
<p>And you&#8217;ve given me more homework.  I still haven&#8217;t caught up with the last assignment, but I haven&#8217;t forgotten.  Keep it coming.  I&#8217;m happy to have the opportunity to share ideas &amp; thoughts like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

